1. 14:04 26th Jun 2009

    notes: 7

    Injustice and Civil War

    Civil war is an awful thing. Whether it’s our civil war, with the Battle of Cold Harbor and Sherman’s March to the Sea or a civil war in Somalia or the Congo, the consequences can be devastating. President Lincoln’s first priority, as passionately as he hated slavery, was avoiding civil war. Casualties are measured in millions. A country is torn asunder, and it could take decades or centuries to mend it back together. How bad must an injustice be before we consider a civil war a preferrable outcome?

    I ask this in the context of Iran. As open and peaceful demonstrations are near impossible, should the reformists continue resisting? How far should they take things?

     
    1. webmarc answered: webmarc.me/post/13…
    2. gospelofmoll answered: Has an aggregation of functional factors made a civil war all but certain? Some clumsy shorthand not implying strict determinism, mind you.
    3. andrewfmorrison answered: The quality of life has to be pretty atrocious to warrant the horrors of civil war, and I certainly do not think it has reached that point.
    4. beret answered: We must step in and bring freedom & democracy, as we have done successfully so many times before.
    5. mjhoy answered: Good question. Depends a lot on how the international community handles things.
    6. sds answered: I’d prefer the protest stop if it would avert a bloody civil war. Iran’s govt has lost much face internationally; may that bring solid change
    7. squashed posted this
     
  2. Comments (View)
    blog comments powered by Disqus